The Case for Banning the Burka in Ireland: Security, Social Integration, and Women’s Rights

The Case for Banning the Burka in Ireland: Security, Social Integration, and Women's Rights

By R McAney

The burka, a full-body covering worn by some Muslim women, has been the centre of heated debates in many Western countries, including Ireland. This article aims to explore the reasons for banning the burka, emphasizing how it dehumanizes women, poses significant security risks, and hinders social integration. Moreover, we will argue that Ireland should follow the examples of countries like France and Belgium, which have implemented bans on face coverings in public places, to protect women’s rights and promote social cohesion.

Dehumanization and Social Isolation

The burka and the niqab (a face veil that leaves only the eyes visible) significantly differ from the hijab, a headscarf that leaves the face open. While the hijab allows for facial recognition and social interaction, the burka and niqab obscure a woman’s identity, which can dehumanize her by stripping away individuality and personal expression. This creates a barrier to social integration, as highlighted in numerous discussions and personal testimonies.

For instance, Shelina Janmohamed, a British Muslim writer, has noted the difficulties in engaging with others while wearing the niqab. She mentioned removing her veil in certain situations to facilitate interaction, such as working with children or elderly neighbours. This indicates an implicit acknowledgement of the social isolation that full-face coverings can cause. The philosopher and critic Yasmin Alibhai-Brown has argued that such coverings imply that women are dangerous to men and society, thus needing to be hidden away. This perspective is seen by many as regressive and incompatible with modern values of gender equality and personal freedom.

Security Concerns

From a security standpoint, the burka and niqab present clear risks. The ability to completely conceal one’s identity can be exploited by individuals with malicious intent, including terrorists. In several cases, terrorists have used burkas to evade detection and carry out attacks. For example, male terrorists have disguised themselves in burkas to avoid recognition and escape from law enforcement. The anonymity provided by full-face coverings can hinder security operations and pose a threat to public safety.

In Ireland, where maintaining public security is a priority, allowing individuals to cover their faces in public spaces can be problematic. The Irish government, by considering a ban on face coverings, would be taking a proactive step towards ensuring that public spaces remain safe and that everyone can be easily identified. This is not a matter of religious discrimination but of practical security measures that apply to all individuals equally.

Promoting Women’s Rights

Another crucial aspect of the debate is the promotion of women’s rights. Critics argue that the burka and niqab are symbols of female oppression, often imposed by patriarchal structures within certain communities. While some women may choose to wear these garments out of personal conviction, others are pressured or even forced to do so. This coerced conformity undermines their freedom and autonomy.

In contrast, countries that have banned the burka have reported positive outcomes. Women who previously felt compelled to wear the burka have expressed relief and newfound freedom following the bans. For instance, in France, where the burka has been banned in public since 2010, many women have embraced the change, finding it empowering to engage more freely in society without the restrictive garment.

Ireland’s Path Forward

Ireland has a long-standing tradition of promoting human rights and equality. Introducing a ban on face coverings like the burka and niqab would align with this tradition by protecting women from coercion and ensuring that all individuals can participate fully in public life. Such a ban would not infringe on religious freedoms any more than existing regulations do. For example, public institutions already have rules that require individuals to show their faces for identification purposes, and these rules apply to everyone regardless of their religious beliefs.

Moreover, implementing a ban would demonstrate Ireland’s commitment to integrating all its citizens into a cohesive society. It would send a clear message that while religious diversity is respected, certain practices that hinder social interaction and pose security risks are not acceptable.

In conclusion, the burka and niqab should be banned in Ireland to protect women’s rights, ensure public security, and promote social cohesion. This measure would help dehumanize women by enabling them to express their individuality, enhance security by preventing the misuse of face coverings, and facilitate better social integration. By taking this step, Ireland would affirm its dedication to upholding human rights and fostering an inclusive society where everyone can participate equally and openly.


  1. Shelina Janmohamed’s views on the niqab and social interaction.
  2. Instances of terrorists using burkas for concealment and security implications.
  3. Positive outcomes of the burka ban in France and its impact on women’s empowerment.

Please support our Sponsors here --